Sania Saeed Powerful Response to Co-Star’s Remarks on Women’s Earnings

In a thoughtful and logical rebuttal, veteran actress Sania Saeed has responded to recent controversial remarks made by a fellow actress about women’s earnings, offering a fresh perspective on what truly constitutes “blessings” in a household.

The discussion arose on a podcast when the host, without naming names, referenced a past statement by an actress understood to be Saima Qureshi who had suggested that women’s earnings lack “barakat” (blessing).

Actress Asma Abbas Shares Unconventional Honeymoon Advice for Son

Sania Saeed began her response by questioning the very definition of “barakat.” “What does ‘blessing in earnings’ even mean?” she asked. She expressed respect for the actress in question, praising her for raising her children well. “What greater blessing can there be than that?” she countered.

She dismantled the argument with clear logic. “If the lack of blessing means that the money gets spent, then this happens with men’s earnings as well,” Sania stated. “How many times have men invested in the stock market and it crashed overnight? Investors can lose everything in a single night.”

For Sania Saeed, true blessing is not about money accumulating, but about the peace and happiness it helps create. She argued that a home where a woman earns and there is peace, children are being raised well, and there is joy, is a home filled with blessing—even if the money is spent. In contrast, a home run by a male earner can lack peace and happiness entirely.

She concluded that the issue might not be about blessings at all, but rather a lack of financial management skills taught to women in society, suggesting this is where the focus should be.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What was the original controversial statement?
While not explicitly named in Sania’s response, it is understood that actress Saima Qureshi had previously expressed a view that women’s earnings lack “barakat” or divine blessing.

2. What was the core of Sania Saeed’s argument?
She redefined “blessing” not as the accumulation of wealth, but as the peace, happiness, and well-being of a family. She argued that if a woman’s earnings contribute to a harmonious home and well-raised children, that is the greatest blessing.

3. How did she counter the financial argument?
She pointed out that men also face financial losses and instability, using the example of the stock market, to show that financial fluctuation is a universal experience, not one tied to gender.

4. What did she suggest was the real problem?
Sania Saeed suggested that the perceived lack of blessing might stem from the fact that women are often not taught how to manage money in a society where men traditionally handle finances.

5. Was her response confrontational?
No, it was respectful and analytical. She expressed fondness for her colleague and framed her rebuttal as a logical exploration of the concepts of blessings and financial stability.